5651 law expanding the investigation phase reality suspicious nature of the evidence unilaterally p

Unlike many other countries, Turkey until 2001, a non-interventionist approach in regulating the Internet started in 2007, although the "internet censorship" has increased the impact of day-to-day. It spreads via the Internet to express up to date expression of the general regulations related crimes are considered to be adequate.
Act of 5651 Internet censorship basis of the legal basis although these changes in the law to make the prepared temporary with 12 items of the "Internet Media Publications on the Regulation and these Publications Committed Through Combating Crimes Law on Amending the Law Deal" especially freedom of communication, privacy is unlimited powers given to public authorities on issues such as terms are subject to criticism.
The basis of the law of hate crimes prevention, ensure mu privacy, to prevent children from accessing harmful content, though considering mu the previous application of the new law will further aggravate the existing mu censorship is gaining justified concerns.
This concerns in increasing the understanding of participatory democracy in our country, the effect could not be established somehow doubt very large. But in a democracy is normally of great masses of communication mu freedom, privacy and its basic Constitutional mu Rights and Human Rights will affect the arrangement if desired to academics, industry representatives, civil society mu organizations opinions are heard around the world on this issue regulations and practices taking into consideration the opposition with the contribution of the proposed law is prepared . However, the process of our country, unfortunately, the only voice processing documents prepared in this way has raised concerns.
5651 law expanding the investigation phase reality suspicious nature of the evidence unilaterally publication to prevent the defendant's spotting the right to the presumption of innocence principle in terms of positive Even though in practice this internet media free and censorship / self-censorship from the relatively distant structures adversely to affect the implementation concerns that are available.
Why blocking access to the "hate speech" is added as well. However, the law on this subject matter is rather vague. As in modern countries under hate crimes in our country should be established for many years that a category is advocated mu by our contemporary criminal lawyers. However, the principle of equality in the context of hate crimes, sexual minorities, religious minorities, such as ethnic minorities encompass all environmental interpretation mu is required.
Location will be denied mu access even if the provider abroad, changing DNS will not be entered on a site. For example, in recent years Youtube closed although users ktunnel, vtunnel such websites or changing DNS to enter this site managed that was closed at the time, even Youtube most visited web site has been one of. Now this is not possible introduction to the banned sites Hotspotshield, Surfsaf, the Security Kiss to banned sites through programs such as still can be entered. mu The function of this program by creating a virtual network from your computer to surf the web as if you use another computer. Do you see the sites that created the virtual mu IP address for your privacy is ensured. However, such programs pose a risk for computer use.
URL blocking access can be made out. This means, for example, Youtube, Twitter, Facebook or T24 on the website as a news portal such as blocking access to just a news, video, etc.. can be applied for. Warning system has been removed, for example, a news T24'Te is cleared mu T24 will be informed later. mu
Under the old system, in some cases without the need for administrative adjudication could remove the broadcast. However, the administration of this authority was limited to only obscenity and sexual exploitation of children. However, the new system "of mu privacy" in the grounds of a judgment can be made without removing the content. So "of privacy" can be interpreted as a pretext mu very broad judgment without blocking access bureaucrats will be able to decide. In such a case the process will be reversed so full of injustice, but the administration's decision before the courts cancellation requests will be pushed right forward. For example, blocking access mu up to date news regarding Considering the fact that the court's decision until the last in a long time the news is already outdated to be the face of vindication also in practice, a value will be left with censorship reached its objective would be.
On the other hand, the concept of obscenity in the present system is also interpreted in a very broad way. Obscenity is what matters, but there has not been a clear definition of the moral values of those whom one should not justify imposition. mu Because sexual content, individuals who prefer to visit websites that carry these preferred size creates the most intimate of private life